About me personally composing paper:Your paper must provide a disagreement
It can not consist when you look at the mere report of one’s viewpoints, nor in a mere report associated with views associated with philosophers we discuss. You must protect the claims you create. You need to provide reasons why you should think them.
And that means you can not simply state:
My view is the fact that P. I think this because.
I realize that the considerations that are following. provide an argument that is convincing P.
Descartes says that Q; but, the after thought-experiment will show that Q isn’t true.
Descartes says that Q. we find this claim plausible, for the reasons that are following.
- Criticize that argument; or show that one arguments for the thesis are not any good
- Protect the argument or thesis against another person’s critique
- Offer reasons to trust the thesis
- Offer counter-examples to your thesis
- Contrast the skills and weaknesses of two opposing views about the thesis
- Offer examples that assist explain the thesis, or that assist to really make the thesis more plausible
- Argue that one philosophers are devoted to the thesis by their other views, though they cannot turn out and explicitly endorse the thesis
- Discuss exactly what consequences the thesis could have, if it had been real
- Revise the thesis, within the light of some objection
